The atrocities of Sinhalese

What could have possibly happened behind the death of tiger supremo?

The TV channel showed the dead body of Prabhakaran.  There were talks that he was preparing for surrender along with frontline leaders. Though the surrender efforts were not officially declared, K.Badhmanabha two days ago, in an interview with the daily mirror, has given statement that there was indeed efforts were made through. Hence suspicion arises at the death of Prabhakaran as the dead bodies of other frontline leaders and their family members were not shown by the army.

What happened during the climax?

Incident study

1.     Prabhakaran must have been shot with 100 mm bore gun on his forehead from very short range, say one meter or two.

2.     This shows clearly he was in very close proximity with the Sinhalese army.

3.     There could be a discussion going on between the tiger leader and the army regarding the surrender terms or could there be even wordy dual between the tiger members

4.     The bullet pierced through his upper forehead making a cut to size more than 3 to 3.5 inches. Possibly the bullet would leave no flesh, bone behind the impact hole.

5.     His eyes were open which shows the shooting was unexpected.

6.     The dead body had no other marks dirt etc.,

7.     His body was shown behind sand bag barricades.

8.     Prabhakaran could have offered his life for the surrender of the remaining tiger leaders and their family members

9.     Only his body was shown and other tiger leaders and their family members’ bodies were not shown immediately or later.

10.  Hence other tiger leaders and there could be under custody of army especially koaththabaya’s supervision.

11.  The families of the tiger leaders have both women and children

12.  They might be undergoing all kind of torture similar to those or worse than the abuse unleashed by the Serbs on the Bosnian Muslims.

13.  There had to be a purge on the soldiers who were at the climax of the onslaught as they know where the families of the surrendered tigers taken to.

14.  Hence they had to be terminated physically as there were talks of international enquiry in to the war time crimes.

15.  The soldiers who knew, where and under whose custody the tiger leaders and their families have been kept, might have leaked the secret and might become witness to the atrocities in case of international enquiries

16.  Therefore, a month ago, it was speculated that they were killed in ambush with tiger remnants near manalaaru area.

17.  Lanka had another benefit out of the killing of its own soldiers. Lanka could continue to get funds showing that it needs funds to fight against the tigers still menacing from hide outs. 

18.  Sinhalese are perverted and they have had history of sexually abusing Tamil women for more than fifty years and Tamil youth had to take arms in their hands to save the honour of Tamil women.

19.  Therefore it is evidently deduced that the Sinhalese thugs could have been sexually abusing the surrendered tiger leaders and the women, including rape, psychological degradation, forced pregnancies etc.,keeping directly at the discretion of gothabaya rajapakshe or makintha rajapakshe.

20.  The Sinhalese proved they were intelligent until the shooting of the Prabhakaran.

21.  After the shooting of Prabhakaran, the whole episodes of what has been going on in northern lanka has been behind strict iron curtain and by keeping so the Sinhalese proved they are the right examples perverted sadists in the world ever to come

How?

1.     If all the leaders were killed in fighting their dead bodies- at least faces- must have been shown as well as the Prabhakaran’s body. There weren’t any telecast of such pictures

2.     If tiger leaders had surrendered along with their family, it would have been announced through media. There wasn’t any such announcement made. 

3.     If others were taken as prisoners, it would have been announced officially.

4.     If the tiger leaders had not surrendered and continued fight until death, there was a chance for discovering all their bodies in the slaughter field. No such discoveries made or announced.

5.     If the war was conducted straight with the tigers, whole episodes of on slaughter could have been different with very minimal civilian casualties.

6.     The war was against the civilians because they were demanding civil liberties or supporting the armed defence of civil liberties.

7.     The war was against the tamil culture as many churches and Hindu temples were cleared off.

8.     The detention centres had no twenty million or forty million people. There were not more than 350 thousands in all.

9.     Hence screening for tigers and resettling could have been easily done with less than three months.

10.  Why delayed resettling? The people in the detention centres must spend all their money in their possession.

11.  They should become morally weak so as to start beg the army personnel and Sinhala thugs for their daily living.

12.  After a year of mental torture and intermittent hunger, sleepless nights, nightmarish enquiries. They would be driven to psychically and morally weak to even fight for their survival.

13.  When they become weakling, they would not rise against any torture unleashed against them in future course of sinhalising the north.

14.  The most of the resettlers’ lands were occupied by the members of rivalries of tigers and rival communities. Resettlers, in such case, cannot claim their land back.

15.  Resettlers cannot get any work so easily as they would be considered supporters of tigers.

16.  Almost all resettlers have to live under open air tolerating sun, rain, Sinhala army’s trespassing, rowdism by rival factions.

17.  Sooner or later the government will eliminate all these 3,50, 000 people from lanka before international bodies awake from their usual inactive sleep.